Effect of 3D Printing in Living Technology Course on Technological Creativity
Proceeding
Tsan-Chieh Huang, Yu-Tzu Lin, Cheng-Chih Wu, National Taiwan Normal University, Taiwan ; Yu-Ying Huang, New Taipei Municipal Hsin Tien Senior High School, Taiwan
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Abstract
This research intends to study the design and development of 3D-printing-based instructional methodology for the living technology course, and its effectiveness on students’ technological creativity. The instructional method was designed based on the design thinking process, which guided students to conduct design and production. This study adopts quasi-experimental research method, the experimental group used 3D modelling and printing to assist creation design, whereas the control group used Gigo bricks to assist creation design. The experiment results show that although the experimental and control group had no differences in the results of the technological creativity test, however, the experimental group performed significantly better on designing and producing technological artifacts in terms of flexibility.
Citation
Huang, T.C., Lin, Y.T., Wu, C.C. & Huang, Y.Y. (2016). Effect of 3D Printing in Living Technology Course on Technological Creativity. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 1314-1319). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 18, 2020 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/173124/.
© 2016 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
References
View References & Citations Map- Mataric, M., Koenig, N., & Feil-Seifer, D. (2007). Materials for Enabling Hands-On Robotics and STEM Education. AAAI Spring Symposium on Robots and Robot Venues: Resources for AI Education, Stanford, CA.
- Oliveira, A.W. (2010). Improving teacher questioning in science inquiry discussions through professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(4), 422-453.
- Stiles, J.R. (2015). Exemplary STEM Programs: Designs for Success. Yager, RE and Brunkhorst, H., eds. Arlington, Virginia USA: NSTA Press,(National Science Teachers Association) 2014. 461 pages. K-12 STEM Education, 1(2), 111-112.
- Hu, W., & Adey, P. (2002). A scientific creativity test for secondary school students. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 389-403.
- Simon, H.A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (Vol. 136). MIT press. Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford(2007). Design thinking process. Palo Alto, Ca: Stanford University
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesSlides
- 0525.ppt (Access with Subscription)
