You are here:

Access to Digital Learning Materials and Student Lecture Attendance Patterns Proceeding

, University of Otago, New Zealand, New Zealand ; , University of Otago, New Zealand

EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Vancouver, BC, Canada ISBN 978-1-939797-24-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Abstract

This paper reports on research aimed at understanding how providing students with lecture materials enhance learning experience. We focused on how lecture materials released to students prior to lectures influence class attendance. We surveyed a large first year Health Science course. Our findings suggest that providing students with lecture materials prior to the delivery of lectures did not directly influence their willingness to attend scheduled lectures, instead, it enriched their learning experience. These findings have wider implications to teaching practice and sets the stage for transforming contemporary forms of lectures.

Citation

Daniel, B.K. & Bird, R. (2016). Access to Digital Learning Materials and Student Lecture Attendance Patterns. In Proceedings of EdMedia 2016--World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 611-617). Vancouver, BC, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved July 23, 2018 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Anderson, T. (2003). Getting the mix right again: An updated and theoretical rationale for interaction. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 4(2), 1-14.
  2. Behr, A.L. (1988). ‘Exploring the lecture method: an empirical study’, Studies in Higher Education, vol. 13, pp. 189–200.
  3. Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington, DC: ISTE; and Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Billings-Gagliardi, S. And K.M. Mazor, (2007). "Student Decisions about Lecture Attendance: Do Electronic Course Materials Matter?" Academic Medicine 82(10): S73-S7610.1097/ACM.1090b1013e31813e31651e.
  4. Bonwell, C. & Eison, J. (1991). Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Brown, G., & Manogue, M. (2001). AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: Refreshing lecturing: A guide for lecturers. Medical Teacher, 23(3), 231-244.
  6. Bull, G., Ferster, B. & Kjellstrom, W. (2012). Inventing the flipped classroom. Learning & Leading with Technology, 40, 1011.
  7. Chaplin, S. (2009). Assessment of the impact of case studies on student learning gains in an introductory biology course. J. Coll. Sci.Teach. 39, 72–79.
  8. Chen, J., & Lin, T.F. (2008). Does downloading PowerPoint slides before the lecture lead to better student achievement? International Review of Economic Education, 7(2), 9-18.
  9. Clay, T. And Breslow, L. (2006). Why students don’t attend class. MIT Faculty Newsletter, 18 (March/April), 6-7. Cohn, E., S.Cohn and J. Bradley Jr. 1995 ‘Notetaking, Working Memory, and Learning in Principles of Economics’, Journal of Economic Education 26(4): 291–307.
  10. Cornelius, T.L., & Owen-DeSchryver, J. (2008). Differential effects of full and partial notes on learning outcomes and attendance. Teaching of Psychology, 35, 6-12.
  11. Costa, M.L, van Rensburg L, Rushton, N. (2007). Does teaching style matter? A randomized trial of group discussion versus lectures in orthopaedic undergraduate teaching. Med Educ. 2007; 41:214-217.
  12. Defour, M. (2013). ‘Flipped classrooms’ spreading in Wisconsin. Community College Week 25, 10.
  13. Devadoss, S. And Foltz, S. (1996). Evaluation of factors influencing student class attendance and performance. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 499-507.
  14. Exeter, D.J., Ameratunga, S., Ratima, M., Morton, S., Dickson, M., Hsu, D., & Jackson, R. (2010). Student engagement in very large classes: The teachers’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 761-775.
  15. Freeman, S., O’Connor, E., Parks, J.W., Cunningham, M., Hurley, D., Haak, D., Dirks, C., and Wenderoth, M.P. (2007). Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 6, 132–139.
  16. Fulton, F. (2012). Upside down and inside out: flip your classroom to improve student learning. International Society for Technology in Education, 39, 12-17.
  17. Gorissen, P., Van Bruggen, J., & Jochems, W. (2012). Students and recorded lectures: survey on current use and demands for higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 20. Grabe, M. And K. Christopherson (2008). "Optional student use of online lecture resources: resource preferences, performance and lecture attendance." Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24(1): 1-10.
  18. Grant, C. (2013). First inversion: a rationale for implementing the ‘flipped approach’ in tertiary music courses. Australian Journal of Music Education, 1, 3-12
  19. Herreid, C.F. & Schiller, N.A. (2013). Case studies and the flipped classroom. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42, 6266.
  20. Hove, M.C., & Corcoran, K.J. (2008). If you post it, will they come? Lecture availability in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 35(2), 91-95.
  21. Hughes, H. (2012). Introduction to Flipping the College Classroom. In T. Amiel & B. Wilson (Eds.), Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2012 (pp. 2434-2438). Chesapeake,
  22. Krause, K. (2007). New perspectives on engaging first year students in learning. Brisbane: Griffith Institute for Higher Education. Accessed March 28th 2016 http://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/37490/FYEEngagemtGriffith2007.pdf Lage, M., Platt, G. & Treglia, M. (2000). Inverting the classroom: a gateway to creating an inclusive learning environment. Journal of Economic Education, 31, 30-43.
  23. Leoni, K. & Lichti, S. (2009). Lecture Capture in Higher Education, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
  24. Michael, J. (2006). Where’s the evidence that active learning works? Advances. Physiology Education, 30, 159 –167.
  25. Mattick K, Crocker G, & Bligh, J. (2007). Medical student attendance at non-compulsory lectures. Advances in health science educational theory and practice; 12:201–210.
  26. Moravec, M., Williams, A., Aguilar-Roca, N., & O'Dowd, D.K. (2010). Learn before lecture: a strategy that improves learning outcomes in a large introductory biology class. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 9(4), 473-481.
  27. Romer, D. (1993). Do students go to class? Should they? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7 (summer), 167-174.
  28. Sams, A & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students’ learning. Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development, 70, 16-20.
  29. Sheely, S. (2006). ‘Persistent technologies: why can't we stop lecturing online?’ in Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who's Learning? Whose Technology? Eds L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear & P. Reimann, Sydney University Press, Adelaide, pp. 769–774.
  30. St Clair, K.L. (1999). A case against compulsory class attendance policies in higher education. Innovative Higher Education, 23, 171-180.
  31. Thatcher, A., Fridjhon, P., & Cockcroft, K. (2007). The relationship between lecture attendance and academic performance in an undergraduate psychology class. South African Journal of Psychology, 37(3), 656-660.
  32. Traphagan, T., Kucsera, J. & Kishi, K. (2010). ‘Impact of class lecture webcasting on attendance and learning’, Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 58, pp. 19–37.
  33. Walvoord, B.E., & Johnson, V.J. (1998). Effective grading: A tool for learning and assessment. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.