You are here:

Elementary Teachers’ Simulation Adoption and Inquiry-Based Use Following Professional Development
article

, Michigan Technological University, United States ; , University of Virginia, United States ; , Oregon State University, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 25, Number 2, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to characterize and compare 64 elementary science teachers’ computer simulation use prior to and following professional development (PD) aligned with Innovation Adoption Theory. The PD highlighted computer simulation affordances that elementary teachers might find particularly useful. Qualitative and quantitative data, including perceptions surveys, participant interviews, Quarterly Lesson Reports, and videotaped lessons, were analyzed to identify changes in participants’ computer simulation use. Variables that hindered or promoted instructional computer simulation use were also identified. There was a significant increase in the number of participants that used computer simulations pre- (17%) to post- (52%) professional development. Implementation patterns following the PD demonstrated participants consciously took advantage of simulations to address appropriate content and for inquiry-based instruction. The primary barrier to instructional computer simulation use was participants’ belief that computer simulations are most effective when used by students independently or in small groups. Findings illuminate Innovation Adoption Theory’s potential and limitations for use when designing educational technology professional development. A modified six-stage adoption model is recommended to address participants’ beliefs.

Citation

Gonczi, A., Maeng, J. & Bell, R. (2017). Elementary Teachers’ Simulation Adoption and Inquiry-Based Use Following Professional Development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(2), 155-184. Waynesville, NC USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved January 24, 2021 from .

© 2017 Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Author (2009). Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education.
  2. Author (2014). Journal of Science Education and Technology.
  3. Baggott la Vella, L., McFarlane, A., John, P.D., & Brawn, R. (2004). According to the promises: The subculture of school science, teachers’ pedagogic identify and the challenge of ICT. Education, Communication& Information, 4, 109-129.
  4. Chiu, J.L., & Linn, M.C. (2012). The role of self-monitoring in learning chemistry with dynamic visualizations. In Zohar, A., Dori, Y., J. (Eds), Metacognition in science education (pp. 133-164). New York: Springer.
  5. Dare, E.A., Ellis, J.A., Roehrig, G.H. (2014). Driven by beliefs: Understanding challenges physical science teachers face when integrating engineering and physics. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education (J-PEER), 4(2), 47-61
  6. Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gonczi, Maeng, and Bell of technology use: A case study. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13, 61-82
  7. Dega B.G., Kriek, J., & Mogese, T.F. (2013). Students’ conceptual change in electricity and magnetism using simulations: A comparison of cognitive perturbation and cognitive conflict. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 677-698.
  8. Foti, S., & Ring, G. (2008). Using a simulation-based learning environment to enhance learning and instruction in a middle school science classroom. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 27, 103-120.
  9. Gerard, L.F., Varma, K., Corliss, S.B., & Linn, M.C. (2011). Professional development for technology-enhanced inquiry science. Review of Educational Research, 81, 408-448.
  10. Gibson, H.L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students’ attitudes towards science. Science Education, 86, 693-705.
  11. Ginns, I.S., & Watters, J.J. (1995). An analysis of scientific understandings of preservice elementary teacher education students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 205-222.
  12. Guzey, S.S., & Roehrig, G.H. (2009). Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9, 25-45.
  13. Ireland, J.E., Watters, J.J., Brownlee, J., & Lupton, M. (2012). Elementary teachers’ conceptions of inquiry teaching: Messages for teacher development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 159-175.
  14. Jeyaraj, A., Rottman, J.W., & Lacity, M.C. (2006). A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research. Journal of Information Technology, 21(1), 1-23.
  15. Lawless, K.A., & Pellegrino, J.W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77, 575-614.
  16. Lederman, N.G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S.K. Abell& N.G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  17. Liao, Y. & Chen, Y. (2007). The effect of computer simulation instruction on student learning: A meta-analysis of studies in Taiwan. Journal of Information Technology and Application, 2, 66-79.
  18. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13, 20-30.
  19. Neiss, M.L. (2008). Guiding preservice teachers in PCK. Technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators. Ed: AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology.pp. 223-250 New York, NY: Routledge
  20. Oliveira, T., & Martins, M.F. (2010, September). Information technology adoption models at firm level: review of literature. In European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, 110-121.
  21. Pennell, S., & Ewing-Taylor, J. (2012, March). 21st Century Learning and Teaching through Integrating Technology into Inquiry-Based Professional Development. In Society for Information Technology& Teacher Education International Conference (Vol. 2012, No. 1, pp. 2055-2060).
  22. Pope, M., Jayroe, T., Franz, D., & Hamil, B. (2008). Teacher candidates and technology: making integration happen. National Forum of Applied Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 1-9.
  23. Posner, G.J., Strike, K.A., Hewson, P.W., & Gertzog, W.A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211-227.
  24. Rogers, E.M. (1985). New product adoption and diffusion. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 290-301.
  25. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th Edition). New York, NY: Free Press.
  26. Schoon, K.J., & Boone, W.J. (1998). Self-efficacy and alternative conceptions of science preservice elementary teachers. Science Education, 82, 553-568.
  27. Sterling, D.R., & Frazier, W.M. (2010). Maximizing uncertified teachers potential. Principal Leadership, 10, 48-52.
  28. Straub, E.T. (2009). Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal Learning. Review of Educational Research, 79, 625649.
  29. Sun, K., Lin, Y., & Yu, C. (2008). A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a web-based lab of science for elementary students. Computers& Education, 50, 1411-1422.
  30. Thayer, K.K. (2013). Diffusion of Innovations in Education. Dissertation manuscript retrieved from http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/ Fsu%3A183915/datastream/PDF/view on December 5, 2016.
  31. Varma, K., Husic, F., & Linn, M.C. (2008). Targeted support for using technology enhanced science inquiry modules. Journal of Science Educational Technology, 17, 341-354.
  32. Vosniadou, S. (1994). Capturing and modeling the process of conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 4, 45-69.
  33. Waight, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2007). The impact of technology on the enactment of “inquiry” in a technology enthusiast’s sixth grade science classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44, 154-182.
  34. Wang, H.H., Moore, T.J., Roehrig, G.H., & Park, M.S. (2011). STEM integration: teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 1(2), 2.
  35. Watson, G. (2006). Technology professional development: Long-term effects on teacher self-efficacy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14, 151-165.
  36. Wecker, C., Kohnle, C., & Fischer, F. (2007). Computer literacy and inquiry learning: When geeks learn less. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23, 133144.
  37. Williams, M., Linn, M.C., Ammon, P., & Gearhart, M. (2004). Learning to teach inquiry science in a technology-based environment: A case study. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 13, 189-206.
  38. Zhang, L., Wen, H., Li, D., Fu, Z., & Cui, S. (2010). E-learning adoption intention and its key influence factors based on innovation adoption theory. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 51(11), 1428-1432.
  39. Zhao, Y., & Bryant, F.L. (2006). Can teacher technology integration training alone lead to high levels of technology integration? A qualitative look at teachers’ technology integration after state mandated technology training. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 5(1), 53 DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

Also Read

Related Collections