Evaluating Automated Instructional Design Systems: A Complex Problem
Educational Technology Volume 34, Number 5, ISSN 0013-1962
Provides a conceptual framework for evaluating Automated Instructional Design (AID) and Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) systems. Evaluation systems including personal, pedagogical, product-oriented, user-oriented, and context-oriented methods are discussed. Figures representing components of the evaluation process are presented. (Contains 25 references.) (SLW)
Gros, B. & Spector, J.M. (1994). Evaluating Automated Instructional Design Systems: A Complex Problem. Educational Technology, 34(5), 37-46.
Cited ByView References & Citations Map
Simon Housego & Mark Freeman
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 16, No. 3 (Jan 01, 2000)
Rafael Andreu, IESE Business School, Spain; Kety Jauregui, ESAN, Peru
Journal of Information Technology Education: Research Vol. 4, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2005) pp. 1–31
These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact email@example.com.