You are here:

Scaffolding and Metacognition
ARTICLE

,

IJMEST Volume 37, Number 2, ISSN 0020-739X

Abstract

This paper proposes an expanded conception of scaffolding with four key elements: (1) scaffolding agency–expert, reciprocal, and self-scaffolding; (2) scaffolding domain–conceptual and heuristic scaffolding; (3) the identification of self-scaffolding with metacognition; and (4) the identification of six zones of scaffolding activity; each zone distinguished by the matter under construction and the relative positioning of the participant(s) in the act of scaffolding. These key elements are illustrated with empirical examples drawn from a variety of research studies. Scaffolding, thus conceived, brings together several theoretical domains, and by situating metacognition within a framework derived from the social activity of scaffolding, a bridge is formed between the instructional support a teacher might provide and the learner's self-control of the learning process. With regard to instruction and the role of the teacher, it is the authors contention that a major object of instruction is the progressive relocation of scaffolding agency in the direction of the learner with the long-term goal of equipping the learner to take control of their own learning.

Citation

Holton, D. & Clarke, D. (2006). Scaffolding and Metacognition. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 37(2), 127-143. Retrieved April 21, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on December 3, 2015. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Designing Web-Based Educative Curriculum Materials for the Social Studies

    Cory Callahan, University of North Carolina Wilmington, United States; John Saye, Auburn University, United States; Thomas Brush, Indiana University, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 13, No. 2 (June 2013) pp. 126–155

  2. Embedding Critical Thinking in IS Curricula

    Theda Thomas, Timothy Davis & Alanah Kazlauskas, Australian Catholic University, Australia

    Journal of Information Technology Education: Research Vol. 6, No. 1 (Jan 01, 2007) pp. 327–346

  3. Teaching for Success: Technology and Learning Styles in Preservice Teacher Education

    Pamela Solvie, Northwestern College, United States; Engin Sungur, University of Minnesota, Morris, United States

    Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education Vol. 12, No. 1 (March 2012) pp. 6–40

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.