You are here:

Online text processing: A study of Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge
ARTICLE

, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran (Islamic Republic Of) ; , Chabahar Maritime University, Iran (Islamic Republic Of)

IRRODL Volume 16, Number 2, ISSN 1492-3831 Publisher: Athabasca University Press

Abstract

The internet has developed into an important source of knowledge in recent times. It is used not just for engaging and entertaining users, but also for promoting language learning, especially for English as a Second/Foreign Language (ESL and EFL) learners spending long hours using internet, 85% of all web pages are in English. This experimental research investigated EFL learners’ experiences of vocabulary learning while surfing and text processing. In this small-scale study, two homogeneous groups of EFL learners )N=19(, after taking a vocabulary test to ensure that their vocabulary knowledge differences were not significant, were randomly assigned to attend Interchange 3 class in two different groups – one as the Experimental and the other as the Control Group. Each session, there was a free discussion on special topics; while the Experimental Group surfed the internet, processed the online texts, shared and discussed their findings and beliefs on the internet, the Control Group did not use the internet and simply shared their opinions and discussed their personal beliefs. The results of the vocabulary pre- and post-tests indicated that the “internet users” significantly outperformed the “non-internet users”, that is, the Control Group. Based on the findings, internet creates a stimulating environment which helps learners effectively boost their vocabulary knowledge.

Citation

Ahangar, A. & Izadi, M. (2015). Online text processing: A study of Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary knowledge. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(2),. Athabasca University Press. Retrieved February 17, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Al-Jarf, R.S. (2004). The effects of web-based learning on struggling EFL college writers. Foreign Language Annals, 37(1), 49-57.
  2. Beauvois, M.H. (1994). E-talk: Attitudes and motivation in computer-assisted classroom discussion. Computers and the Humanities, 28(3), 177-190.
  3. Blasszauer, J. (2001). Collaborative projects via the internet. Teaching English With Technology: A Journal for Teachers of English, 1(6), 1-7.
  4. Braine, G., & Yorozu, M. (1998). Local area network (LAN) computers in ESL and EFL writing classes: Promises and realities. JALT Journal, 20(2), 47-59.
  5. Brandl, K. (2002). Integrating internet-based reading materials into the foreign language curriculum: From teacher-to student-centered approaches. Language Learning& Technology, 6(3), 87-107.
  6. Chalmers, P.A. (2003). The role of cognitive theory in human–computer interface. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(5), 593-607.
  7. Ching, Y.H., & Hsu, Y.C. (2013). Peer feedback to facilitate project-based learning in an online environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 258-276.
  8. Cononelos, T., & Oliva, M. (1993). Using computer networks to enhance foreign language/culture education. Foreign Language Annals, 26(4), 527-534.
  9. Cox, M., Webb, M., Abbott, C., Blakeley, B., Beauchamp, T., & Rhodes, V. (2004). A review of the research literature relating to ICT and attainment. London: Becta.
  10. Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the internet: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill
  12. Gass, S.M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Routledge.
  13. Gu, Y., & Johnson, R.K. (1996). Vocabulary learning strategies and language learning outcomes. Language Learning, 46(4), 643-679.
  14. Hellebrandt, J. (1999). Virtual collaborations in the Spanish class: From e-mail to web design and CD-ROM development. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(1), 59-70.
  15. Hertel, T.J. (2003). Using an e-mail exchange to promote cultural learning. Foreign Language Annals, 36(3), 386-396.
  16. Honeyfield, J. (1977). Word frequency and the importance of context in vocabulary learning. RELC Journal, 8(2), 35-42.
  17. Hult, S., Kalaja, M., Lassila, O., & Lehtisalo, T. (1990). Hyperreader—an interactive course in
  18. Jogan, M.K., Ana, H.H., & Gladys, A.M. (2001). Cross-cultural e-mail: Providing cultural input for reading comprehension. System, 18(2), 189-198.
  19. Jowallah, R. (2014). An investigation into the management of online teaching and learning spaces: A case study involving graduate research students. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4), 186-198.
  20. Kost, C.R. (1999). Enhancing communicative language skills through effective use of the worldwide web in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 32(3), 309-320.
  21. Kroonenberg, N. (1994). Developing communicative and thinking skills via electronic mail. TESOL Journal, 4(2), 24-27.
  22. LeLoup, J.W. (1997). But I only have e-mail--what can I do? Learning Languages, 2(2), 10-15.
  23. Liu, M. (1995). Hypermedia assisted instruction and second language learning: A semanticnetwork-based approach. Computers in the Schools, 10(3-4), 293-312.
  24. Lunde, K.R. (1990). Using electronic mail as a medium for foreign language study and instruction. Calico Journal, 7(3), 68-78.
  25. Mahmoudi, E., & Razak, N.Z.B.A. (2012). Attitude and students’ performance in computer assisted English language learning (CAELL) for learning vocabulary. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 489-498.
  26. Meishar-Tal, H., Kurtz, G., & Pieterse, E. (2012). Facebook groups as LMS: A case study. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 33-48.
  27. Meskill, C., & Anthony, N. (2005). Foreign language learning with CMC: Forms of online instructional discourse in a hybrid Russian class. System, 33(1), 89-105.
  28. Mike, D.G. (1996). Internet in the schools: A literacy perspective. Journal of Adolescent& Adult Literacy, 40(1), 4-13.
  29. Morgan, J., Rinvolucri, M., & Maley, A. (1986). Vocabulary. Oxford University Press.
  30. Mustafa, H.R., Sain, N., & Razak, N.Z.A. (2012). Using internet for learning vocabulary among second language learners in a suburban school. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 425-431.
  31. Najafi, H., Evans, R., & Federico, C. (2014). MOOC integration into secondary school courses. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(5), 306-322.
  32. Naraghizadeh, M., & Barimani, S. (2013). The effect of CALL on the vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 3(8), 1-12.
  33. Nation, P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. Retrieved from http://www.lextutor.ca/
  34. Schreurs, B., Van den Beemt, A., Prinsen, F., Witthaus, G., Conole, G., & De Laat, M. (2014). An investigation into social learning activities by practitioners in open educational practices. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(4), 1-20.
  35. Agca, R.K., & Özdemir, S. (2013). Foreign language vocabulary learning with mobile technologies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 781-785.
  36. Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2009). Learning in a sheltered internet environment: The use of webquests. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 423-432.
  37. Shams, I.E. (2013). Hybrid learning and Iranian EFL learners’ autonomy in vocabulary learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1587-1592.
  38. Singhal, M. (1997). The internet and foreign language education: Benefits and challenges. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(6), 107.
  39. Turgut, Y., & Irgin, P. (2009). Young learners’ language learning via computer games. ProcediaSocial and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 760-764.
  40. Velasquez, A., Graham, C.R., & West, R.E. (2013). An investigation of practices and tools that enabled technology-mediated caring in an online high school. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 14(5), 277-299.
  41. Warschauer, M. (1995). Virtual connections: Online activities and projects for networking language learners: Natl Foreign Lg Resource Ctr.
  42. Weininger, M.J., & Shield, L. (2003). Promoting oral production in a written channel: An investigation of learner language in MOO. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(4), 329-349.
  43. Yang, S.C. (2001). Language learning on the worldwide web: An investigation of EFL learners' attitudes and perceptions. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(2), 155-182.
  44. Yang, S.C., & Chen, Y.-J. (2007). Technology-enhanced language learning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 860-879.
  45. Zarei, G.R., & Khazaie, S. (2011). L2 vocabulary learning through multimodal representations. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 369-375.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.