You are here:

Validation of e-Fuzion: a Wireless Classroom Technology
PROCEEDINGS

, , , , University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Phoenix, Arizona, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-50-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the potential of wireless devices and associated collaborative software developed for the improvement of learning by undergraduate students in a large class setting. Students' learning gained from the course, perception of the software, and interaction among students were used as indicators of the effectiveness. As a result, students showed better learning and positive perception of the software, but there was a great deal of variance of interaction. Following the result, implications for practices and research were offered.

Citation

Wentling, T., Peiper, C., Bristow, P. & Park, J.H. (2003). Validation of e-Fuzion: a Wireless Classroom Technology. In A. Rossett (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2003--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 343-350). Phoenix, Arizona, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 3, 2020 from .

© 2003 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (1988). New directions in learning: Understanding media symbol systems. Educational Technology, 28 (2), 28-30.
  2. Anjaneyulu, K.S.R., Singer, R.A., & Harding, R. (1998). Usability studies of a remedial multimedia system. Journal of Educational Multimedia System, 7(2/3), 207-236.
  3. Dringus, L.P. (1995). An iterative usability evaluation procedure for interactive online courses. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 7 (4), 10-14.
  4. Gilcher, K.W., & Johnstone, S.M. (1988). A critical review of the use of audiographic conferencing systems by selected educational institutions. Washington, D.C.: Annenberg/ CPB project and University of Maryland University College, Office of Instructional Telecommunications.
  5. Grimoni, J.A.B., Belico Dos Reis, L., & Tori, R. (1998). The use of multimedia in engineering education: An experience. ED 443731.
  6. Hillman, D.C.A., Willis, D.J., and Gunawardena, C.N. (1994). Learner-interface interaction in distance education: En extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2), 30-42.
  7. Moore, M.G. (1989). Three types of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 3 (2), 1-6.
  8. Rheingold, H. (1990). An interview with Don Norman. In B. Baurel (ed.), The Art of Human-Computer Interface Design. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  9. Shackel, B. (1997). Human-computer interaction: Whence and whither? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48 (11), 970-986.
  10. Volery, T., & Lord, D. (2000). Critical success factors in online education. The International Journal of Educational Management, 14 (5), 216-223.
  11. Wagner, E.D. (1994). In support of a functional definition of interaction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8 (2), 6-29.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References