Using social networking environments to support collaborative learning in a Chinese university class: Interaction pattern and influencing factors
ARTICLE
Jie Lu, Daniel Churchill
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Volume 30, Number 4, ISSN 0814-673X Publisher: Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education
Abstract
This paper reports a study that investigated the social interaction pattern of collaborative learning and the factors affecting the effectiveness of collaborative learning in a social networking environment (SNE). A class of 55 undergraduate students enrolled in an elective course at a Chinese university was recruited for the study. The participants used an SNE to support their learning activities over a semester. Data was collected through interviews, classroom observations, and from digital artifacts created in the SNE. Social network analysis and content analysis were adopted to analyze data. The results showed that social interaction in the SNE tended to be teacher-centered, social-oriented, fragmented, and short-lived. Pre-existing social relations, perceptions of the teacher and peer feedback, preferred learning approaches and collaboration strategies, nature of the task, and the individualistic nature of social networking technology were factors that influenced how students interacted with each other in collaborative learning mediated by the SNE. The findings have both practical and theoretical implications.
Citation
Lu, J. & Churchill, D. (2014). Using social networking environments to support collaborative learning in a Chinese university class: Interaction pattern and influencing factors. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(4),. Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/148492/.
References
View References & Citations Map- Baggetun, R., & Wasson, B. (2006). Self-regulated learning and open writing. European Journal of Education, 41, 453-472. Doi:10.1111/J.1465-3435.2006.00276.x
- Bower, M. (2008). Affordance analysis-matching learning tasks with learning technologies. Educational Media International, 45, 3-15. Doi :10.1080/09523980701847115
- Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 210-230.
- Bryan, A. (2006). Web 2.0: A new wave of innovation for teaching and learning? EDUCAUSE Review, 41(2), 32. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero
- Cho, H., Gay, G., Davidson, B., & Ingraffea, A. (2007). Social networks, communication styles and learning performance in a CSCL community. Computers & Education, 49, 309-329.
- Cole, M. (2009). Using Wiki technology to support student engagement: Lessons from the trenches. Computers & Education, 52, 141-146. Doi:10.1016/J.compedu.2008.07.003
- Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). C. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3, 105-122. of Educational Technology, 2014, 30(4).
- Deng, L. (2010). Cultivating blog-supported learning communities of teachers (Doctoral dissertation) the University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Retrieved from http://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/57611
- Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by "collaborative learning"? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, 1-19. Amsterdam: Pergamon, Elsevier Science.
- Dippold, D. (2009). Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced German class. ReCALL, 21(1), 18-36. Doi10.1017/S095834400900010X
- Garton, A. (1992). Social interaction and the development of language and cognition. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., & Anderson, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397-431.
- Isaacson, L.E. (1997). Career information, career counseling, and career development (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- King, A., Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Mandl, H., & Haake, J.M. (2007). Scripting collaborative learning processes: A cognitive perspective scripting computer-supported collaborative learning (Vol. 6, pp. 13-37). New York, NY : Springer.
- Kreijns, K. (2004). Sociable CSCL environments: Social affordances, sociability, and social presence. (Doctoral dissertation), Open University of the Netherlands, Netherlands, Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1820/1030
- Kreijns, K., Kirschner, P.A., & Jochems, W. (2003). Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 335-353. Doi:10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00057-2
- Lipponen, L., Rahikainen, M., Lallimo, J., & Hakkarainen, K. (2003). Patterns of participation and discourse in elementary students' computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 13, 487-509. Doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00042-7
- Manca, S., Delfino, M., & Mazzoni, E. (2009). Coding procedures to analyse interaction patterns in educational web forums. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25, 189-200.
- Matthew, K., & Felvegi, E. (2009). Learning course content by creating a wiki. TechTrends, 53, 67-73.
- McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Proceedings of the ascilite Singapore 2007 In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning, Singapore, 664-675. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf.
- Newman, M.E.J., & Girvan, M. (2004). Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69, 026113.
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (1999). Assessing social presence in asynchronous text-based computer conferencing. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 50-71.
- Rourke, L., Anderson, T., Garrison, D.R., & Archer, W. (2001). Methodological issues in the content analysis of computer conference transcripts. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12 (2001), 8-12. Retrieved from http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00197319/
- Rovai, A.P. (2002). Sense of community, perceived cognitive learning, and persistence in asynchronous learning networks. The Internet and Higher Education, 5, 319-332.
- Scott, J. (1991). Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage Publications.
- Secher, H.P. (1962). Basic concepts in sociology. New York, NY: Citadel Press.
- Shen, D., Nuankhieo, P., Huang, X., Amelung, C., & Laffey, J. (2008). Using social network analysis to understand sense of community in an online learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 39, 17-36. Doi:10.2190/EC.39.1.b
- Sim, J.W.S., & Hew, K.F. (2010). The use of weblogs in higher education settings: A review of empirical research. Educational Research Review, 5, 151-163. Doi:10.1016/J.edurev.2010.01.001
- Tan, J. (2010). Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 31, 227-228.
- Tu, C.-H., Blocher, M., & Roberts, G. (2008). Constructs for Web 2.0 Learning Environments: A Theatrical Metaphor. Educational Media International, 45(4), 253-269. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09523980802588576
- Veldhuis-Diermanse, A.E. (2002). CSCLearning?: participation, learning, activities and knowledge construction in computer-supported collaborative learning in higher education. Doctoral dissertation, Retrieved from http://edepot.wur.nl/121278
- Wasserman, S. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Wellman, B. (1996). For a social network analysis of computer networks: a sociological perspective on collaborative work and virtual community. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCPR/SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research, Denver, Colorado, United States. 1-11,
- Xie, Y., Ke, F., & Sharma, P. (2008). The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes. The Internet and Higher Education, 11, 18-25.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References