You are here:

Creating a Conducive Learning Environment for the Effective Integration of ICT: Classroom Management Issues
Article

, , , , , , Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

Journal of Interactive Learning Research Volume 14, Number 4, ISSN 1093-023X Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC

Full Text

Abstract

This article reports and discusses the findings of the collective case study of two primary schools in Singapore. It is part of a larger funded research project that examines and analyses where and how information and communication technologies (ICT) are integrated in Singapore schools to develop pupils' higher order thinking skills. The focus of this article is on classroom management issues that create a conducive environment to facilitate the effective integration of ICT in the schools. In such an environment, pupils are more likely to be task-oriented and reflective, and hence, more likely to engage in higher order thinking. Using activity theory as a framework, the following classroom management issues are discussed: availability of ICT resources, establishment of rules and procedures, support of ICT-based activities by non-ICT and ICT tools, and division of labour among participants.

Citation

Lim, C.P., Teo, Y.H., Wong, P., Khine, M.S., Chai, C.S. & Divaharan, S. (2003). Creating a Conducive Learning Environment for the Effective Integration of ICT: Classroom Management Issues. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 14(4), 405-423. Norfolk, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 22, 2019 from .

© 2003 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Bers, T.H. (1994). Exploring institutional images through focus group interviews. In N., Bennett, R., Glatter, & R., Levacic (Eds.), Improving educational management through research and consultancy (pp. 290-299). London: The Open University.
  2. Brophy, J. (1979). Teacher behaviour and its effects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 733-750.
  3. Brophy, J., & Good, T.L. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. In M.C. Witttrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan. 422 Lim, Teo, Wong, Khine, Chai and Divaharan
  4. Cole, M., & Engeström, Y. (1993). A cultural-historical approach to distributed cognition In G., Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp.1-46).
  5. Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M.C., Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  6. Doyle, W. (1990). Classroom management techniques. In O.C., Moles (Ed.), Student discipline strategies: Research and practice. Albany: State University of New York Press.
  7. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R-L (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). New York:
  8. Emmer, E.T., & Evertson, C.M. (1981). Synthesis of research on classroom management. Educational Leadership, 51(8), 12-15.
  9. Evertson, C.M., Emmer, E.T., Clements, B.S., & Worsham, M.E. (1997). Classroom management for elementary teachers (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  10. Fisher, C., Dwyer, D.C., & Yocam, K. (1996). The APPLE classroom of tomorrow – an overview, education and technology – reflections on computing in classrooms (pp.1-12). San Francisco:
  11. Gettinger, M. (1988). Methods of proactive classroom management. School Psychology Review, 17, 227-242.
  12. Good, T. (1982). Classroom research: What we know and what we need to know (R & D report no. 9018). Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, University of Texas at Austin.
  13. Holland, D., & Reeves, J.R. (1994). Activity theory and the view from somewhere: Team perspectives on the intellectual work of programming. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1, 9-24.
  14. Kounin, J.S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  15. Leont’ev, A.N. (1981). The problem of activity in Psychology. In J.V., Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 41-68). New York: Sharpe.
  16. Lim, C.P. (2001). Learner control and task-orientation in a hypermedia learning environment: A case study of two economics departments. International Journal of Instructional Media, 28(3), 271-285.
  17. Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., & Kottkamp, R. (1999). West Virginia’s basic skills/computer education program: An analysis of student achievement. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Family Foundation.
  18. Marcovitz, D.M., Hamza, M.K., & Farrow, V.R. (2000). Students and support for technology in the elementary classroom. Computers in the Schools, 16(3/4), 213-225.
  19. Ministry of Education (1997). Launch of Masterplan for IT in Education. Press Release 015/97.
  20. Munn, P., Johnstone, M., & Chalmers, V. (1990). How do teachers talk about maintaining effective discipline in their classrooms? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.
  21. Parks, A., & Pisapia, J. (1994). Developing exemplary technology-using teachers. Research Brief #8. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 411 360)
  22. Pelgrum, W.J. (2001). Obstacles to the integration of ICT in education: Results from a worldwide educational assessment. Computers & Education, 37, 163-178.
  23. Potter, J. (2000). First steps in organising ICT in the Primary classroom. In M. Leask & J. Meadows (Eds.), Teaching and learning with ICT in the primary school (pp. 124-143). London: Routledge.
  24. Sanford, J.P., Emmer, E.T., & Clements, B.S. (1983). Improving classroom management. Educational Leadership, 40(7), 56-60.
  25. Salomon, G. (1993). No distribution without individuals’ cognition. In G. Salomon (Ed.), Distributed cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations (pp. 111-138). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  26. Sharan, S. (1994). Handbook of cooperative learning methods. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
  27. Sheingold, K., Hawkins, J., & Char, C. (1984). I’m the thinkist, you are the typist: The interaction of technology and the social life of classrooms. Journal of Social Issues, 40(3), 49-61.
  28. Silverman, D. (1994). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction. London: SAGE.
  29. Sivin-Kachala, J. (1998). Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools, 1990-1997. Washington, DC: Software Publishers Association.
  30. Stake, R.E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: SAGE.
  31. Verenikina, I. & Gould, E. (1997). Activity theory as a framework for interface design. ASCILITE ’97, Perth, 611-615.
  32. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  33. Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center.
  34. Williams, D., Coles, L., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., & Tuson, J. (2000). Teachers and ICT: Current use and future needs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 307-320.
  35. Wong, P. (2000). Managing IT classrooms. In M.D. Williams (Ed.), Integrating technology into teaching and learning (pp. 121-139). Singapore: Prentice Hall.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.