You are here:

Rules for Online Argumentation and Discussion: A Work in progress Report
PROCEEDINGS

, University of Canterbury, New Zealand ; , National Institute of Education, Singapore

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Phoenix, Arizona, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-50-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Abstract

This paper describes and discusses the Project ROAD - Rules for Online Argumentation and Discussion. The paper in particular discusses the mediating importance of rules to be well established for online discussions with the complementary emphasis of personal and collective representations for online discussions. In addition, the paper discusses the current work in progress with reference to the proposal for a multi-tier way of encouraging response to an invitation, better termed as "legitimacy to response". In essence, the paper is only an attempt to share the ideas of the project to the community of educators and researchers.

Citation

Chen, D.T.V. & Hung, D. (2003). Rules for Online Argumentation and Discussion: A Work in progress Report. In A. Rossett (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2003--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2212-2215). Phoenix, Arizona, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 18, 2019 from .

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References