You are here:

Systematic Review of Design-Based Research Progress: Is a Little Knowledge a Dangerous Thing?
ARTICLE

,

Educational Researcher Volume 42, Number 2, ISSN 0013-189X

Abstract

Sufficient attention and resources have been allocated to design-based research (DBR) to warrant review concerning if and how its potential has been realized. Because the DBR literature clearly indicates that this type of research strives toward both the development of an intervention to address a problem in practice and empirical investigation yielding theoretical understanding that can inform the work of others, thoughtful assessment of DBR progress must devote substantial attention to each of these aspects. This requires an in-depth analysis of full-text reports of DBR, framed by a refined conceptualization of the intended outputs of DBR, and ideally, complemented by empirical investigation involving design-based research participants directly.

Citation

McKenney, S. & Reeves, T.C. (2013). Systematic Review of Design-Based Research Progress: Is a Little Knowledge a Dangerous Thing?. Educational Researcher, 42(2), 97-100. Retrieved October 17, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on July 1, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.