You are here:

The Effects of Game Strategy and Preference-Matching on Flow Experience and Programming Performance in Game-Based Learning
ARTICLE

,

IETI Volume 47, Number 1, ISSN 1470-3297

Abstract

Learning to program is difficult for novices, even for those undergraduates who have majored in computer science. The study described in this paper has investigated the effects of game strategy and preference-matching on novice learners' flow experience and performance in learning to program using an experiential gaming activity. One hundred and fifteen novices participated in the experimental activity. Two types of game strategy were employed: the matching-challenging strategy and the challenging strategy. Participants were categorised into one or other of the two groups based on individual preferences. The results of the study showed that: (1) the challenging group had higher flow experiences than the matching-challenging group; (2) participants' performance was enhanced with the use of the matching strategy; and (3) a compensation effect existed among the preference-mismatched learners who performed better in the challenging game-play. (Contains 4 tables and 4 figures.)

Citation

Wang, L.C. & Chen, M.P. (2010). The Effects of Game Strategy and Preference-Matching on Flow Experience and Programming Performance in Game-Based Learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 39-52. Retrieved October 19, 2019 from .

This record was imported from ERIC on April 19, 2013. [Original Record]

ERIC is sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education.

Copyright for this record is held by the content creator. For more details see ERIC's copyright policy.

Keywords

Cited By

View References & Citations Map

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.