Correlation between Grades Earned and Time in Online Courses
ARTICLE
Lin Carver, Keya Muhkerjee, Robert Lucio
Online Learning Journal Volume 21, Number 4, ISSN 2472-5730
Abstract
Online education is rapidly becoming a significant method of course delivery in higher education. Consequently instructors are analyzing student performance in an attempt to better scaffold student learning. Learning analytics can provide insight into online students\u2019 course behaviors. Archival data from 167 graduate level education students enrolled in 4 different programs and 9 different online courses was analyzed in an attempt to determine if there was a correlation between their grades and the time spent in specific areas within the course: the total time within the course, the course modules, document repository, and synchronous online sessions. Data was analyzed by total time in course, time in modules, time in document repository, and time in the online synchronous discussions as well as by program. Time spent in each component did not correlate with the specific letter grade, but did correlate with earning an A or not earning an A. The sample was composed of students from four different graduate education programs: Educational Leadership, Reading, Instructional Design, and Special Education. Variations were found between programs, but the differences did not significantly correlate with the grade earned in the course. A logical progression revealed that of all the predictor variables, only time spent in synchronous online sessions showed as a significant predictor of receiving an A in the course. This is important information for instructor when providing scaffolding for students.
Citation
Carver, L., Muhkerjee, K. & Lucio, R. (2017). Correlation between Grades Earned and Time in Online Courses. Online Learning Journal, 21(4),. Retrieved March 19, 2024 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/183781/.
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Allen, E. & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States 2009. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
- Avella, J.T., Kebritchi, M., Nunn, S.G., & Kanai, T. (2016). Learning analytics methods, benefits, and challenges in higher education: A systematic literature review. Online Learning, 20(4). Retrieved from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/790/201 Bhardwaj, B.K., & Pal, S. (2011). Data mining: A prediction for performance improvement using classification. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 9(4), 136-140.
- Campus Computing. (2010). The 2010 national survey of information technology in U.S. Higher education. Retrieved from http://www.campuscomputing.net/sites/www.campuscomputing.net/files/GreenCampusComputing2010.pdf.
- Campus Computing. (2015). The 2015 campus computing survey. Retrieved from http://www.campuscomputing.net/item/2015-campus-computing-survey-0 Carver, L., Todd, C., Hahn, K., & Mukherjee, K. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the effect of flipping online classes using asynchronous interactive online tool. Creative Education, 4(7A), 126-129. Retrieved from http://file.scirp.org/pdf/CE_2013071816214937.pdf
- Ciabocchi, E., Ginsberg, A., & Picciano, A. (2016). A study of faculty governance leaders’ perception of online and blended learning. Online Learning, 20(3), 53-73. Retrieved from https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/974 Dawson, S., McWilliam, E., & Tan, J.P.-L. (2008). Teaching Smarter: How mining ICT data can inform and improve learning and teaching practice. Paper presented at ASCILITE 2008, Melbourne, Australia.
- Falloon, G. (2011). Making the connection: Moore’s theory of transactional distance and its relevance to the use of a virtual classroom in postgraduate online teacher education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(3), 187-209.
- Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. A study of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning methods discovered that each supports different purposes. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51-55.
- Jo, I., Kim, D., & Yoon, M. (2015). Constructing proxy variables to measure adult learners’ time management strategies in LMS. Educational Technology& Society, 18(3), 214-225.
- Joo, Y., Jang, M., & Lee, H. (2007). An in-depth analysis of dropout factors based on cyber university student’s dropout experiences. The Journal of Educational Information Media, 13(3), 209-234.
- Macfadyen, L.P. & Dawson, S. (2012). Numbers are not enough. Why e-Learning analytics failed to inform and institutional strategic plan. Educational Technology& Society, 15(3), 149-163.
- Means, B., Toyanna, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidencebased practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation, and Policy Development.
- Mitchell, T.R. (1985). An evaluation of the validity of correlational research conducted in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 192–205.
- Pattillo, R.E. (2007). Decreasing transactional distance in a web-based course. Nurse Educator, 32(3), 109-112.
- Picciano, A.G. (2012). The evolution of big data and learning analytics in American higher education. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16 (3), 9-20.
- Putman, S., Ford, K., & Tancock, S. (2012). Redefining online discussions: Using participant stances to promote collaboration and cognitive engagement. International Journal of Teaching& Learning in Higher Education, 24(2), 151-167.
- Simon, M., & Goes, J. (2013). Dissertation and scholarly research: Recipes for success. Seattle, WA: Dissertation Success LLC.
- Tinto, V. (1998). Learning communities: Building gateways to student success. The National Teaching and Learning Forum, 7(4).
- West, D. & Heath, D. (2016). Let’s talk learning analytics: A framework for implementation in relation to student retention. Online Learning, 20(2). Retrieved from http://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/792/202 Zhao, Y., Lei, J., Yan, B., Lai C., & Tan, H.S. (2005). What makes the difference? A practical analysis of research on the effectiveness of distance education. Teachers College Record, 107(8), 1836-1884.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to References