You are here:

The Influence of Technology on Teachers' Ways of Knowing Mathematics
PROCEEDINGS

, University of Wales Swansea, UK

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, ISBN 978-1-880094-28-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Full Text

Abstract

During the early stages of an investigation of the integration of technology into teacher thinking using Shulman’s teacher knowledge framework (Shulman, 1986), it became clear that the ways in which teachers know their subject are an important influence on their teaching approaches, that learning with technology is likely to produce a change in ways of knowing, and an understanding of this change can form a useful part of a teacher’s pedagogical content knowledge.

Citation

Kennewell, S. (1998). The Influence of Technology on Teachers' Ways of Knowing Mathematics. In S. McNeil, J. Price, S. Boger-Mehall, B. Robin & J. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1998--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 597-600). Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved January 27, 2021 from .

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Assessment of Performance Unit (1984). A review of monitoring in mathematics 1978:1982. Windsor: National Foundation for Educational Research.
  2. Hart, K. (Ed.) (1982). Children’s understanding of mathematics, 11-16. London: John Murray.
  3. Hoyles, C., & Sutherland, R. (1992). A pedagogy for mathematics microworlds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23, 31-57.
  4. Kennewell, S. (1996). Computer-supported modelling in the curriculum: Final report to the University of Wales Subject Panel. Swansea: University of Wales Swansea
  5. Küchemann, D. (1978). Children’s understanding of numerical variables. Mathematics in Schools, 7, 24-28.
  6. Mason, J. (1995). Less may be more on a screen. In Burton, L. & Jaworski, B. (Eds.), Technology in mathematics teaching. Bromley: Chartwell-Bratt.
  7. Noss, R., & Hoyles, C. (1993). Bob-A suitable case for treatment?, Journal of Curriculum Studies, 25, 201-218.
  8. Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical conceptions: reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the same coin. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22, 1-36.
  9. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4-14.
  10. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
  11. Tall, D. (1995) Cognitive growth in elementary and advanced mathematical thinking, in Meira, L. & Carreher, D. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 19th Psychology of Mathematics Education Conference (Vol.1. Pp. 61-75). Recife, Brazil:

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References