You are here:

Rethinking Educational Spaces: A Review of Literature on Urban Youth and Social Media
ARTICLE

, University of Houston-Downtown, United States ; , The Pennsylvania State University, United States

Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia Volume 23, Number 2, ISSN 1055-8896 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

Invited as a paper from SITE 2012

This paper serves as an exploration into the landscape of social media use in educational research as it relates to urban youth in the United States. Initially, a social and learning context is provided that situates the implications social media may have for urban youth within formal and informal educational spaces. The paper offers a discussion of social media and recent studies in educational research as they relate to formal and informal learning spaces followed by implications of social media for these environments. A case is presented to reconceptualize a teaching and learning process with that of a social media process thereby connecting both the formal academic space with the informal emergent educational space afforded by social media. To this point we have attempted to establish a social context of education for urban youth.

Citation

Kidd, T.T. & Carpenter, II, B.S. (2014). Rethinking Educational Spaces: A Review of Literature on Urban Youth and Social Media. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 23(2), 189-208. Waynesville, NC USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved March 26, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abramson, L. (2011). Can social networking keep students in school? NPR: Morning Edition. Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://www.npr.org/2011/02/09/133598049/ Can-social-networking-keep-students-in-school.
  2. Ajjan, H., & Hartshorne, R. (2008). Investigating faculty to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 71-80.
  3. Augustsson, G. (2010). Web 2.0, pedagogical support for reflexive and emotional social interaction among Swedish students. Internet and Higher Education, 13(1), 197205.
  4. Austin, W., & Totaro, M.W. (2011). High school students’ academic performance and internet usage. Journal of Economic and Economic Education Research, 12(1), 4153.
  5. Banks, J. (2003). Handbook of research on multicultural education (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
  6. Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecologies perspective. Human Development, 49, 193–224.
  7. Bull, G., Thompson, A., Searson, M., Garofalo, J., Park, J., Young, C., & Lee, J. (2008). Connecting informal and formal learning: Experiences in the age of participatory media. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 8(2). Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://www.citejournal.org/vol8/iss2/editorial/article1.cfm. Carter, P.L. (2010). Cultural Flexibility among Students in Different Racial and Ethnic School Contexts. Teachers College Record, 112(6), 1529-1574.
  8. Carter, P.L. (2008). At-risk learners. In T. Good (Ed). 21st Century education: A reference handbook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  9. Carter, P.L. (2003). Black cultural capital, status positioning, and the conflict of schooling 206 Kidd and Carpenter
  10. Cataldi, E.F., Laird, J., and KewalRamani, A. (2009). High School Dropout and Completion Rates in the United States: 2007 (NCES 2009-064). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
  11. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D.J. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D.J. Leu. (Eds.) The handbook of research in new literacies (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ:
  12. Datnow, A. (2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 121-153.
  13. Dennis, E.E. & DeFleur, M.L. (2010). Understanding media in the digital age: Connections for communication, society, and culture. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Donath, J., & Boyd, D. (2004). Public displays of connection. BT Technology Journal, 22(4), 71-82.
  14. Greenhow, C., Robelia, E., & Hughes, J. (2009).Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259.
  15. Hargreaves, A. & Goodson, I. (2006). Educational change over time? The sustainability and non-sustainability of three decades of secondary school change and continuity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(1), 3-41.
  16. Ito, M. (2009). Engineering play: a cultural history of children’s software. Boston, MA: The MIT Press. Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, B., boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P.G., Pascoe, C.J., Robinson, L., Baumer S., Cody, R., Mahendran, D., Martínez, K., Perkel,D., Sims, C., & Tripp, L. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings
  17. Junco, R., & Cotten, S.R. (2010). Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers& Education, 56, 370-378.
  18. Junco, R., Heiberger, G., & Loken, E. (2011). The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 119-132.
  19. Junco, R., Merson, D., & Salter, D.W. (2010). The effect of gender, ethnicity, and income on college students’ use of communication technologies. Cyber Psychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(6), 37-53.
  20. Kirkland, D. (2007). Exploring literacy in urban cyberspace. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of English, New York.
  21. Kirkland, D. (2008). Shaping the digital pen: Media literacy, youth culture, and MySpace. Youth Media Reporter, 2(4), 188-200.
  22. Kok, A. (2008). Evaluation of an online social constructivist tool based on a secondary school experience in a Middle East country. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 4(3). Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=498.
  23. Ladson-Billings. G. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what’s it doing in a nice field like education? Qualitative Studies in Education, 11(1), 7-24.
  24. Lampe, C., Resnick, P., Forte, A., Yardi, S., Rotman, D., Marshall, T., & Lutters, W. (2010). Educational priorities for technology-mediated social participation. IEEE Computer, 43 (11), 60-67.
  25. Lankshear, C. And Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom Learning (2nd ed.). Maidenhead & New York: Open University Press.
  26. Lenhart, A. (2003). Adolescents, parents and technology: Highlights from the Pew Internet& American Life Project. Paper presented to the Lawlor Group, Long Beach, CA.
  27. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. (2005). Teens and technology: Youth are leading the transition to a fully wired and mobile nation. Washington, DC: Pew Internet& American Life Project.
  28. Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: the rise of the instantmessage generation and the internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Washington, DC: Pew Internet& American Life Project.
  29. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A.R., & Smith, A. (2007). Teens and social media. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trusts.
  30. Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and young adults. Pew Internet Project and American Life Survey. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trust.
  31. Martin C.A. (1975). The continuing crisis of urban education. Journal of Negro Education, 44(3), 225-229.
  32. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M.J.W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. Paper presented at the ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf.
  33. Mesch, G.S. & Talmud, I. (2010). Wired youth: The social world of adolescence in the information age. London: Routledge.
  34. Mesch, G.S. (2006). Family characteristics and intergenerational conflicts over the internet. Information, Communication& Society, 9(4), 473-495.
  35. Moje, E.B. (2004). Powerful spaces: Tracing the out-of-school literacy spaces of Latino/a youth. In K.M. Leander& M. Sheehy (Eds.), Spatializing literacy research and practice (pp. 15-38). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
  36. National Center for Education Statistics (2010). Conditions of education (NCES 2010 028) National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC.
  37. Noguera, P.A. (2003).The trouble with black boys: The role and influence of environmental and cultural factors on the academic performance of African American Males. Urban Education, 38(1), 431-459.
  38. Obiakor, F.E., & Beachum, F.D. (2005). Urban education for the 21st century: Research, issues, and perspectives. Springfield, IL: CC Thomas Publishing.
  39. O’Brien, D., & Scharber, C. (2008). Digital literacies go to school: Potholes and possibilities. Journal of Adolescent& Adult Literacy, 52, 66-68.
  40. Pellerin, L.A. (2005). Student disengagement and the socialization styles of high schools. Social Forces, 84(2), 1159-1179.
  41. Pensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. From On the Horizon, MCB University Press, 9(5). Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://www.marcprensky.com/ Writ ing/Prensky%20-%20D ig ita l%20Nat ives,%20D ig ita l%20Imm igrants%20-%20 Part1.pdf.
  42. Rideout, V.J., Foehr, U.G., & Roberts, D.F. (2010) Generation M2: Media in the lives of 8-to 18-year-olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Retrieved February 4, 2014, from http://www.kff.org/entmedia/8010.cfm. Strauss, W., & Howe, N. (2000). Millennials rising: The next great generation. New York: Vintage.
  43. Thurlow, C. (2006). From statistical panic to moral panic: The metadiscursive construction and popular exaggeration of new media language in the print media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3), article 1.
  44. Ullrich, C., Borau, K., Luo, H., Tan, X., Shen, L., & Shen, R. (2008). Why Web 2.0 is good for learning and for research: Principles and prototypes. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the 17th international conference on WorldWide Web.
  45. Zhang, J. (2009). Toward a creative social web for learners and teachers. Educational

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.