Assessing the Impact of Faculty Development for Online Instructors
PROCEEDINGS
Emily Hixon, Janet Buckenmeyer, Casimir Barczyk, Lori Feldman, Purdue University Calumet, United States
E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Honolulu, Hawaii, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-90-7 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA
Abstract
This study summarizes the results of a program evaluation of the Distance Education Mentoring Program (DEMP), an ongoing initiative at Purdue University Calumet, Indiana (USA) designed to enhance the development of online courses by mentoring faculty in instructional design principles and technology. The evaluation covers a four year period and is based on a survey of 47 protégé-participants, who are both faculty members and clients of the program, using an anonymous online questionnaire. The research questions yielded evidence that focused on two broad themes, one of which was faculty participation, satisfaction, and university impact of the program. The second theme addressed the programmatic modifications required by a changing faculty client base. Policy implications for program administrators are discussed to help universities develop a competitive advantage in the growing market for online education.
Citation
Hixon, E., Buckenmeyer, J., Barczyk, C. & Feldman, L. (2011). Assessing the Impact of Faculty Development for Online Instructors. In C. Ho & M. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2011--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 672-681). Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 25, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/38787/.
© 2011 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
Keywords
References
View References & Citations Map- Bonk, C.J. (2001, May). Online teaching in an online world. Bloomington, IN: CourseShare.com. Retrieved from http://www.publicationshare.com/docs/faculty_survey_report.pdf Giannoni, D.L., & Tesone, D.V. (2003). What academic administrators should know to attract senior level faculty
- Knowles, E., & Kalata. K. (2007). A model for enhancing online course development. Innovate, 4(2). Retrieved from http://www.innovateonline.info/pdf/vol4_issue2/A_Model_for_Enhancing_Online_Course_Development.p Df
- MarylandOnline (2006). Quality Matters: Inter-institutional quality assurance in online learning, available at: http://www.qualitymatters.org.
- National Education Association. (2000, June). A survey of traditional and distance learning higher education members. Washington, DC: Author.
- Oblinger, D.G., & Hawkins, B.L. (2006). The myth about online course development: “ A faculty member can individually develop and deliver an effective online course. ” Educause Review, 41(1), 14-15.
- Ooman-Early, J., & Murphy, L. (2009). Self-actualization and e-learning: A qualitative investigation of university faculty’ s perceived needs for effective online instruction. International Journal on E-Learning: Corporate Government, Healthcare, & Higher Education, 8(2), 223-240.
- Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for the online classroom. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Palloff, R.M., & Pratt, K. (2001). Lessons from the cyberspace classroom: The realities of online teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Puzziferro, M., & Shelton, K. (2008). A model for developing high-quality online courses: Integrating a systems approach with learning theory. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 119-136.
- Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusions of innovations (5th Ed). New York: Free Press.
- Shearer, R. (2003). Instructional design in distance education: An overview. In M.G. Moore& W.G. Anderson (Eds.), Handbook of Distance Education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Soundarajan, N. (2004). Program assessment and program improvement: closing the loop. Assessment& Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5), 597-610.
- White, C. (2000). Collaborative online course development: Converting correspondence courses to the web. Educational Technology, 40(6), 58-60.
- Weldy, T., Spake, D. & Sneath, J. (2008). Challenges and best practices: meeting AACSB and SACS requirements. The Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 4(2), 15-21.
- Xu, H, & Morris, L.V. (2007). Collaborative course development for online courses. Innovative Higher Education, 32, 35-47.
- Yang, Y. & Cornelious, L. (2005). Preparing instructors for quality online instruction. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring81/yang81.htm
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.
Suggest Corrections to ReferencesSlides
- elearn2011_deprogeval_2011Oct13.pdf (Access with Subscription)
