You are here:

Students’ Conceptions of Learning Management: A Comparison between traditional instruction and Web-based Learning environment
PROCEEDINGS

, Minghsin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan ; , National Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taiwan

Global Learn, in Penang, Malaysia ISBN 978-1-880094-79-2 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Abstract

This study is to investigate the differences between students’ conceptions of learning management in traditional instruction and web-based learning environment. The Conceptions of Learning Management Inventory (COLM) was administered to 259 Taiwan college students who majored in business administration. The COLM had six factors (categories), including learning management as memorizing, as testing, as applying, as gaining higher status, as understanding, and as seeing in a new way. These categories are considered as in a hierarchical order, from lower-level to higher level. Results suggested that students agree more with the “seeing in new way” category when learning management in the web-based environment, while they showed stronger acknowledgement toward the conceptions of “memorizing,” “testing,” “gaining higher status,” and “applying” categories when learning management via traditional instruction. It is suggested that web-based instruction can promote students’ higher-level conceptions of learning management.

Citation

Lin, H.M. & Tsai, C.C. (2010). Students’ Conceptions of Learning Management: A Comparison between traditional instruction and Web-based Learning environment. In Z. Abas, I. Jung & J. Luca (Eds.), Proceedings of Global Learn Asia Pacific 2010--Global Conference on Learning and Technology (pp. 1229-1236). Penang, Malaysia: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved December 14, 2019 from .

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References