Synchronous Educational Robotics Competitions in the Virtual World
Bradley Barker, University of Nebraska - Lincoln, United States ; Gwen Nugent, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States ; Neal Grandgenett, University of Nebraska at Omaha, United States ; Viacheslav Adamchuk, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States
EdMedia + Innovate Learning, in Honolulu, HI, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-73-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Waynesville, NC
Robotics competitions with middle and high school students are well-established mechanisms to enhance student interest and engagement in STEM career pathways and to build teamwork skills. However, synchronous in-person competitions pose a variety of barriers that may limit student participation. To combat the most prevalent barrier, travel and associated costs, the Nebraska 4-H Robotics and GPS/GIS project ran a virtual robotics competition where teams of participants competed in real-time from geographically dispersed sites across the state. This exploratory study examined the effectiveness of a virtual robotic competition to help foster student competencies in work related skills.
Barker, B., Nugent, G., Grandgenett, N. & Adamchuk, V. (2009). Synchronous Educational Robotics Competitions in the Virtual World. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 3237-3242). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 19, 2019 from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/31944/.
© 2009 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)
- Beer, R., Hillel, J., Chiel, J., & Drushel, R. (1999). Using Robotics to Teach Science and Engineering. Communications of the ACM, 42(6), 85-92.
- Blalock, L., Strieter, L., & Hughes, L. (2006). The SCANS Skills and Competencies Checklist: An Assessment Tool for Youth Work Readiness Programs. Journal of Youth Development: Bridging Research and Practice, 1(1).
- FIRST (2008). 2009 FLL Product Descriptions and Pricing, from http://www.usfirst.org/community/fll/content.aspx?id=3674 Lauwers, T., Nourbakhsh, I., & Hamner, E. (2009). CSBots: Design and development of a robot designed for the CS1 classroom. Paper presented at the SIGCSE 09, Chattanooga, TN.
- Ma, Y., Lai, G., Prejean, L., Ford, M., & Williams, D. (2007). Acquisition of Physics Content Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry Skills in a Robotics Summer Camp. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference (SITE), San Antonio, Texas.
- Melchior, F., Cohen, F., & Leavitt, T. (2005). More than robots: An evaluation of the first robotics competition participants and institutional impacts Retrieved 4/3/2009, 2009, from http://www.usfirst.org/uploadedFiles/Who/Impact/Brandeis_Studies/FRC_eval_finalrpt.pdf Nourbakhsh, I.R., Crowley, K., Bhave, A., Hamner, E., Hsiu, T., Perez-Bergquist, A., et al. (2005). The Robotic Autonomy Mobile Robotics Course: Robot Design, Curriculum Design and Educational Assessment. Autonomous Robots, 18(1), 103-127.
- Rogers, C., & Portsmore, M. (2004). Bringing engineering to elementary school. Journal of STEM Education, 5(3/4), 17-28.
- Weinberg, J.B., Pettibone, J.C., Thomas, S.L., Stephen, M.L., & Stein, C. (2007). The Impact of Robot Projects on Girls AttitudesToward Science and Engineering. Paper presented at the Robotics Science and Systems (RSS) Workshop on Research in Robots for Education. From http://www.roboteducation.org/rss-2007/ U.S. Department of Labor (1992). Learning for living: A blueprint for high performance. Washington D.C.
These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact email@example.com.