You are here:

Developing an Online Master of Education in Educational Technology in a Learning Paradigm: The Process and The Product
Article

, , Northern Arizona University, United States ; , University of Illinois, United States

Journal of Technology and Teacher Education Volume 11, Number 1, ISSN 1059-7069 Publisher: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education, Waynesville, NC USA

Abstract

The political process necessary for planning and implementing a new degree program at Northern Arizona University (NAU), The Educational Technology Master of Education (M. Ed.), began in the spring of 1997. The program was finally discussed and approved by the Arizona Board of Regents at their February, 2000 meeting. However, over the three years of establishing the program, it became much more than just a political or academic task. As the process of research, discussion, and reflection was experienced while searching for an ideal M. Ed. in Educational Technology program, current struggles with new pedagogies and new approaches were exemplified. The program development became living proof that changes in thinking and doing come over time, not in a day, or a week, or even a year. As the developers struggled to articulate to each other what they believed to be important, they became what can only be hoped for students in this new program: uncomfortable learners who stretched their minds and pushed the envelopes of their comfort zones to complete an engaging and meaningful task.

Citation

Willis, E., Tucker, G. & Gunn, C. (2003). Developing an Online Master of Education in Educational Technology in a Learning Paradigm: The Process and The Product. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 5-21. Norfolk, VA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved March 19, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Curran, D. (1997). ODL and traditional universities: Dichotomy or conver-20 Willis, Tucker, and Gunn
  2. Daniel, J. (1996). Mega-universities and knowledge media: Technology strategies for higher education. London: Kogan Page.
  3. Fulton, K. (1996). Moving from boxes and wires to 21st century teaching. T.H.E. Journal, 24(4), 76-82.
  4. Moore, J. (1991). Crossing the chasm. New York: HarperBusiness.
  5. Moore, J. (1995). Inside the tornado. New York: HarperBusiness.
  6. Mumford, L. (1939). Technics and civilization. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
  7. Norton, P., Sprague, D. (1995). Changing teachers—teachers changing schools: Assessing a graduate program in technology education. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 5(1/2), 93-105.
  8. Norton, P., & Sprague, D. (1997). A proposal for revision of track two— in-s truc t iona l technology program: Integration of technology in schools. Fairfax, VA: Graduate School of Education, George Mason University.
  9. Office of Technology Assessment (1995). Teachers and technology: Making the connection (No. OTA-HER-616). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
  10. Turkle, A. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the internet. New York: Simon& Schuster.
  11. Yocam, K. (1996). Teacher-centered staff development for integrating tech DASHDASH

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. Making a Difference for Middle School Teachers: When University Faculty Go to Schools to Help

    Pavel Samsonov, Toby Daspit, Mayers Edith & Christine Briggs, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2008 (Mar 03, 2008) pp. 3913–3917

  2. Revising ETC 557 Remaining Constructivist in a Standards-based, Teach to the Test World:

    Elizabeth Willis, Northern Arizona University, United States; Hong Zhan, Northern Arizona Universwity, United States; Shadow Armfield, Northern Arizona University, United States

    Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (Mar 26, 2007) pp. 1164–1167

  3. Mavericks, Late Majority and Laggards: Our Experience Implementing Blackboard in a High School

    Pavel Samsonov & Chris Briggs, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2006 (June 2006) pp. 3062–3069

  4. Introducing Blackboard Delivery System in a High School:

    Pavel Samsonov & Marlene Beard, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, United States

    EdMedia + Innovate Learning 2005 (Jun 27, 2005) pp. 2328–2333

  5. It Is Not As Hard As It Seems: Teaching Online

    Pavel Samsonov & Marlene Beard, University of Louisiana, United States

    E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2003 (2003) pp. 1160–1164

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.