You are here:

Gaming the Learning: Making curricular tools such as tests, presentations, and learning activities intrinsically fun
PROCEEDING

, West Virginia UniversitySuncrest Middle School, United States ; , West Virginia University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Savannah, GA, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

“Gaming the Learning” is a process whereby curricular tools such as tests, presentations, and learning activities can be used to enhance the intrinsic fun involved in learning and therefore increase motivation and learning outcomes. This study investigated the effects of “Gaming the Learning” in a middle school general science class. The participants for this study were 165 students, ages 13-14 years old, who were enrolled in 8th grade at a mid-Atlantic middle school. For this study an introductory biology unit was designed using “Gaming the Learning”. The results indicated that the instructional design of the unit using a game-like environment was successful and students exhibited learning.

Citation

Dowling, A. & Ahern, T. (2016). Gaming the Learning: Making curricular tools such as tests, presentations, and learning activities intrinsically fun. In G. Chamblee & L. Langub (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2822-2826). Savannah, GA, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 20, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Ahern, T.C. (2009, October). Bridging the gap: Cognitive scaffolding to improve computer programming for middle school teachers. Paper presented at Frontiers in education conference, 2009. Fie '09. 39th ieee Retrieved from
  2. Alfieri, L., Brooks, P.J., Aldrich, N.J., & Tenenbaum, H.R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning?. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1.
  3. Baker, C. (2008, March). Trying to design a truly entertaining game can defeat even a certified genius. Wired, 16(4). Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/gaming/gamingreviews/magazine/16-04/pl_games.
  4. Brown, A.L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. The journal of the learning sciences, 2(2), 141-178.
  5. Bruner, J.S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction (Vol. 59). Harvard University Press.
  6. Carroll, J.B. (1963). A model of school learning. The Teachers College Record 64, 723-733.
  7. Catrambone, R. (1998). The subgoal learning model: creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 127(4), 355-376.
  8. Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and Education. Collier Books:NY
  9. Heibert, J., & Stigler, J.W. (2004). A world of difference: Classrooms abroad provide lessons in teaching math and science. Journal of Staff Development, 24(4), 10-15
  10. Kaptelin, V., & Cole, M. (2002). Individual and collective activities in educational computer game playing. In T. Kosmann, R. Hall, & N. Miyake (Eds.), g2057CSCL 2: Carrying forward the conversation (pp. 303–316).
  11. Klopfer, E., Osterweil, S., & Salen, K. (2009). Moving learning games forward. Retrieved from http://education.mit.edu/papers/MovingLearningGamesForward_EdArcade.pdf.
  12. Lepper, M.R., & Malone, T.W. (1987). “Intrinsic motivation and instructional effectiveness in computer-based education,” In R.E. Snow& M.J. Farr (Eds.) Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 3. Cognitive and affective process analysis, (1987) Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 255-286.
  13. Menn, D. (1993, October). Multimedia in education. PC World, M52-M60
  14. Prensky, M. (2002). The motivation of gameplay or, the real 21st century learning revolution. On the Horizon, 10(1).
  15. Schwartz, D., Chase, C., Oppezzo, M., & Chin, D. (2011). Practicing versus inventing with contrasting cases: The effects of telling first on learning and transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(4), 759-775.
  16. Sylvester, T. (2013). Designing Games: A Guide to Engineering Experiences. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, Inc. Tondello, G., (2015) The Use of Games and Play to Achieve Real-World Goals. Gamification Research Network. Retrieved from http://gamification-research.org/2015/06/the-use-of-games-and-play-to-achieve-real-worldgoals/#sthash.7IZaAkdn.dpuf/.
  17. Vogel, J.J., Vogel, D., Cannon-Bowers, J., Bowers, C., Muse, K., & Wright, M. (2006). Computer gaming and interactive simulations for learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 34(3), 229-243.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.