You are here:

Factors Related to Teachers’ Adoption of a Two-Way Interactive Distance Education Technology
Article

, Palestinian Curriculum Development Center, Israel ; , Iowa State University, United States

IJET Volume 3, Number 4, ISSN 1077-9124 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

The purpose was to identify factors related to teachers' perceived likelihood of using a state-wide, two-way, interactive distance education technology. A research model was developed and tested. Data were collected via survey from 325 teachers who attended inservice training. Teachers' attitude regarding use of the technology in their professional role as educators was the primary predictor of their likelihood of using it for instruction. Teachers' attitude toward using the technology was in turn significantly predicted by their habit of using other technologies, their attitude toward the technology's educational promise, the strength of their beliefs about positive consequences of using it, and the strength of their beliefs about the influence of the opinions of important others on their use of it. Attitude about use was not related to their attitude toward the technology's logistical constraints or the strength of their beliefs about negative consequences of using it. Results are discussed in terms of theory and practice.

Citation

Abou-Dagga, S.I. & Huba, M.E. (1997). Factors Related to Teachers’ Adoption of a Two-Way Interactive Distance Education Technology. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 3(4), 401-414. Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 23, 2019 from .

Keywords

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Abou-Dagga, S.I. (1995). Factors related to the adoption of a two-way interactive distance education technology: Instrument development, in DASHDASH
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  3. Beaudoin, M. (1990). The instructor’s changing role in distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 4, (2), 21-29. Bentler , P. , & Speckart , G. (1979). Models of attitude behavior relations. Psychological Review, 86, 452-464.
  4. Biddle, B., Bank, B., & Slayings, R. (1987). Norms, preferences, and reten-t ion decisions. Social Psychology Quarterly, 50(4) :322-337. Charng , H. , Piliavin , J. , & Callero , P. (1988). Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51 (4), 303-317.
  5. Clark, T. (1993). Attitudes of higher education faculty toward distance education: A national survey. The American Journal of Distance Educa-t ion, 7 (2), 19-33.
  6. Dillon, C., & Walsh, S. (1992). Faculty the neglected resource in distance 414 Abou-Dagga and Huba Eagly , A. , & Chaiken , S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. For t Worth: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich College Publishers. Fu l lan, M. (1990). Staff development, innovation, and institutional development. In B. Joyce (Ed.) , Changing school culture through staff development (pp. 3-28). Alexandria, VA : Association for Supervision
  7. Glicher, K., & Johnstone, S. (1989). A critical review of the use of audiographic conferencing systems by selected educational institutions. College Park, MD : International Universities Consortium, University of Maryland. Grandberg , D. , & Holmberg, S. (1990). The intention-behavior relationship among U.S. And Swedish voters. Social Psychology Quarterly, 53 (1) , 44-54.
  8. Moore, M.G. (1989). The effects of distance learning: A summary of literature. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment.
  9. Rogers, E.M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: Free Press.
  10. Schlosser, C., & Anderson, M. (1994). Distance education: Review of the literature. Association for Educational Communication and Technology. Threlkeld , R. , & Brzoska , K. (1994). Research in distance education. In B. Willis (Ed.) , Distance education: Strategies and tools (pp. 41-66). NJ:

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.

View References & Citations Map

Cited By

  1. A Model for Predicting an Individual’s Use of a Telematics Application for a Learning-Related Purpose

    Betty Collis & Nico Pals, University of Twente

    International Journal of Educational Telecommunications Vol. 6, No. 1 (2000) pp. 63–103

These links are based on references which have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake, please contact info@learntechlib.org.