You are here:

An Introductory Examination Comparing Factors Influencing K-12 Teachers Perceptions and Use of Emerging Technological Tools by Urban, Suburban, and Rural Schools
PROCEEDINGS

, , , University of Central Florida, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Las Vegas, NV, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-13-1 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Full Text

Abstract

Web 2.0 technologies are being implemented into K-12 classrooms; however the rate of utilization and implementation lags behind students’ usage outside school settings. Utilization of Web 2.0 tools in educational settings can provide innumerable instructional benefits, specifically, the potential to develop 21st century learning skills. The study will investigate teachers’ perceptions and usage (type and amount) of emerging technologies and compare potential variations within and between rural, urban, and suburban school settings, in an effort to identify relationships between school setting and use, perceptions of benefits, and factors that influence adoption or non-adoption decisions of these technologies. This study will help inform preservice teacher preparation, support and professional development opportunities for inservice teachers, as well as future research.

Citation

Campbell, L.O., Kepple, M. & Herlihy, C. (2015). An Introductory Examination Comparing Factors Influencing K-12 Teachers Perceptions and Use of Emerging Technological Tools by Urban, Suburban, and Rural Schools. In D. Rutledge & D. Slykhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2015--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2219-2225). Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved October 21, 2019 from .

© 2015 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman: New York. Bloom, B.S. (Ed.), Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E.J., Hill, W.H., & Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay
  2. Bouck, E.C. (2004). How Size and Setting Impact Education in Rural Schools. Rural Educator, 25(3), 38-42.
  3. Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 179-183.
  4. Ferdig, R.E. (2007). Editorial: Examining social software in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), 5-10.
  5. Hartshorne, R., & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies:Theory and empirical tests. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21(3), 183-198.
  6. Kahn, R.L. (2012). A Taxonomy for Choosing, Evaluating, and Integrating In-the-Cloud Resources in a University Environment. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 41(2), 171-181.
  7. Madden. A., Lenhart, M., Duggan, M, Cortesi, S., & Gasser, U. (2013). Teens and technology 2013: Main findings. Pew Research. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/03/13/main-findings-5/ National School Board Association. (2007). Creating& Connecting: Research and guidelines on online social— and educational— networking. National School Boards Association. Retrieved from http://www.nsba.org/sites/default/files/reports/CREATING-CONNECTING-Research-and-Guidelines-onOnline-Social-and-Educational-Networking.pdf
  8. Newland, B., & Byles, L. (2013). Changing academic teaching with Web 2.0 technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 51(3), 315-325. Doi:10.1080/14703297.2013.796727
  9. Penuel, W.R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329-348.
  10. Phirangee, K. (2013). Beyond the elementary classroom walls: Exploring the ways participation within Web 2.0 spaces are reshaping pedagogy. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 22(3), 299-316.
  11. Shin, D.S. (2014). Web 2.0 tools and academic literacy development in a US urban school: A case study of a second-grade English language learner. Language and Education, 28(1), 68-85. Doi:10.1080/09500782.2013.771653
  12. Sullivan, C. (2011). An investigation of 21st century tools in a sixth grade classroom of a suburban middle school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (UMI No. 3476661)
  13. Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144-176.
  14. Wood, L. & Howley, A. (2012) Dividing at an early age: the hidden digital divide in Ohio elementary schools, Learning, Media and Technology, 37:1, 20-39, DOI:10.1080/17439884.2011.567991

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections