You are here:

SOCIAL MEDIA AND EPISTEMIC DISCOURSE: DESIGNING INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITIES
PROCEEDINGS

, West Vriginia University, United States

Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, in Jacksonville, Florida, United States ISBN 978-1-939797-07-0 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Chesapeake, VA

Abstract

This paper describes an instructional design strategy to help teachers create learning activities that make effective use of social media. In order to create effective instruction, the designer should have a clear understanding of the intended outcome. Next, the designer should be able to identify the epistemic discourse they want to use in order to effectively match the most appropriate social media with the intended learning outcome. Using social media can create a rich learning environment that crosses all content areas.

Citation

Ahern, T. (2014). SOCIAL MEDIA AND EPISTEMIC DISCOURSE: DESIGNING INSTRUCTIONAL ACTIVITIES. In M. Searson & M. Ochoa (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 2014--Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 51-58). Jacksonville, Florida, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved February 16, 2019 from .

View References & Citations Map

References

  1. Ahern, T. (2001).Learning by design: Engineering the learned state. Paper presented at the 6th World MultiConference in Systemic, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando, FL.
  2. Ausubel, D.P. (1960).The use of advance organizers in the learning and retention of meaningful verbal materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(5), 267-272.
  3. Belew, R.K. (1990). Evolution, learning, and culture: Computational metaphors for adaptive algorithms. Complex Systems, 4, 11-49.
  4. Boud, D. (1990). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 90, 9-17.
  5. Brabek, M., & Jeffrey, J. (2009). Practice for knowledge acquisition (Not drill and kill). Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/education/k-12/practice-acquisition.aspx (October 2013)
  6. Collins, A., & Ferguson, W. (1993). Epistemic forms and epistemic games: Structures and strategies to guide inquiry. Educational Psychologist, 28(1), 25-42.
  7. Cunningham, W. (2002).What’s a Wiki. Retrieved from http://wiki.org/wiki.cgi?WhatIsWiki DeVries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63-103.
  8. Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books. Ericsson, A..K., Krampe, R.T., &Tesch-Romer, C. (1993).The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406.
  9. Flavell, J.H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906-911.
  10. Gagne, R.M., Briggs, L.J., & Wager, W.W. (1988).Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt Rinehart& Winston.
  11. Granovetter, M.S. (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380. Jonassen, D., (1984). 'Integrating learning strategies into courseware to facilitate deeper processing '. In: D. Jonassen (Ed), Instructional design for microcomputer courseware. New York: Erlbaum. Pp.151-181
  12. Krathwohl, D.R. (2002). A revision of Bloom's taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41(4), 212-218.
  13. Maron, D.F (2013) How Social Media is changing disaster response: Congress is grappling with the benefits and risks of using Facebook, Twitter and other social media during emergencies. Scientific American June 7, 2013 Norman, D.A., (1988). The psychology of everyday things. New York: Basic Books.
  14. Ohlsson, S. (1996). Learning to do and learning to understand: A lesson and a challenge for cognitive modeling In P. Riemann & H. Spade (Eds.), Learning in humans and machines: Towards an interdisciplinary learning science (pp. 37-62) Bingley, UK: Emerald Group.
  15. Shirky, C. (2011) The political power of social media: Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change. Foreign Affairs [retrieved online at] http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/67038/clay-shirky/the-political-powerof-social-media# (October 2013)
  16. Schraw, G., & Moshman, D. (1995).Metacognitive theories.Educational Psychology Review, 7(4), 351-371..
  17. Zeng, L., Hall, H., & Pitts, M.J. (2012).Cultivating a community of learners: The potential challenges of social media in Higher Education. In H.S.N. Al-Deen & J.A. Hendricks (Eds.), Social Media: Usage and impact (pp. 111-128). Plymouth, United Kingdom: Lexington books

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. If you see a mistake in the references above, please contact info@learntechlib.org.