You are here:

Coloring Outside the Lines: Rethinking Blended Learning
PROCEEDINGS

, Learning Peaks, LLC, United States

E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, in Washington, DC, USA ISBN 978-1-880094-54-9 Publisher: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), San Diego, CA

Full Text

Abstract

The definition that most folks use for "blended learning" includes a mix of online and classroom instruction. This definition is exceedingly narrow and limits our thinking and what we can achieve. We can also blend a host of other elements in order to take advantage of their unique affordances. In this session, Patti Shank will involve the audience in an investigation of the affordances of various blendable elements in order to explore how coloring outside the lines can improve instructional impact.

Citation

Shank, P. (2004). Coloring Outside the Lines: Rethinking Blended Learning. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.), Proceedings of E-Learn 2004--World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 2-6). Washington, DC, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 25, 2019 from .

© 2004 Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE)

Keywords

References

View References & Citations Map
  1. Brown, B. L. (2000). Web-based training (ERIC Digest No. EDO -CE- 218): Center on Education and Training for Employment, College of Education, The Ohio State University.
  2. Brown, J. S. (2000, March/April). Growing up digital: How the we b changes work, education, and the ways people learn. [Electronic version]. Change , 11- 20.
  3. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (1999, December). Students' frustration with a webbased distance education course. First Monday, 4(12). Retrieved November 19, 2000 from http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_12/hara/Harasim, L.M., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L., & Turnoff, M. (1996). Learning networks: A field guide to teaching and learning online.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  4. Laurillard, D. (2002, January/February). Rethinking teaching for the knowledge society. Educause Review, Retrieved April 22, 2002 from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/erm0201.pdf
  5. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (1996). Distance education: A systems view. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
  6. Ryder, M., & Wilson, B. G. (1996, February 14- 18). Affordances and constraints of the internet for learning and instruction. Paper presented at Association for Educational Commu nications Technology (AECT). Retrieved September 11, 2002, from http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~mryder/aect_96.html
  7. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-buildin g communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3 (3), 265- 283.
  8. Shank, P. (2002). Learning anew: An exploratory study about new online learners' perceptions of people interaction and learning to learn in an online course. In P. Barker & S. Rebelsky (Eds.), Proceedings of educational multimedia, hypermedia & Telecommunications (edmedia) (pp. 2167 -2171). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  9. Shea, R. H., & Boser, U. (2001, October 15). So where's the beef? There's quality online, but it takes real work to find it. [Electronic version]. U.S. News & World Reports, 44 -54.
  10. Singh, H., & Reed, C. (2004). Achieving success with blended learning: A white paper. Navowave, Inc. The Learning Alliance for Higher Education. (2004). Mixed skies ahead: What happened to e-learning and why. Change, 36(2), 55-58.

These references have been extracted automatically and may have some errors. Signed in users can suggest corrections to these mistakes.

Suggest Corrections to References

Also Read

Related Collections